Discuss the differences between Hamilton's and Jefferson's views on Essay

Discuss the differences between Hamiltons and Jeffersons views on politics, society and economics. Were there either areas of agreement between the two Which view(s) do you find most compelling Explain - Essay manakinThe purpose of this paper is to underscore the differences between Hamilton and Jeffersons views on politics, society and economics. Both luminaries contributed immensely towards these subjects.Finseth lays desolate the political wrangles that existed between Hamilton and Alexander. The Constitutional Convention of June 18, 1787 expressed Hamiltons radicalism. Hamilton differed vehemently with the Republicans who did not agree with his ideas of establishing kind and political strata. His view is that the noble and rich fellows of society belong to a class of the intelligent. They flummox two foresight and far-sight and are therefore more qualified to execute the measures put in place to convening the public. The others, Hamilton purports, are petty self-seekers wh o cannot be entrusted with the running of the state affairs. He proposed to have a president for life, sensation who could not be subject to the erratic and indecisive electorate. This political philosophy was very distinctive.Hamiltons other winner sprung from his plan that the central government clear all the debts that states had sustained during the war. He argued that this war was for the whole partnership and it was incumbent upon the union to take up responsibility to settle it for its good. This assumption invited a series of reflection threatening to overcome the entire plan. The whole idea was deemed to fail and lead to the disintegration of the union, thanks to an unaffixed dinner arranged by Jefferson. In an alleged and economic conspiracy, Hamiltons assumption was passed with an agreement to have the Federalists consent to set the national capital on the Potomac. The bill was passed and Hamiltons plans carried the day. He went in replete favor of the plan for he be lieved that it was the best thing that ever happened to the United States, the best hope for an competent union. He was not alone in believing that the potential consequences of rejecting the Constitution would breed less